Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. A universal classification of eukaryotic transposable elements implemented in Repbase. A novel class of SINE elements derived from 5S rRNA. r2cat: synteny plots and comparative assembly. ABACAS: algorithm-based automatic contiguation of assembled sequences. Improving draft assemblies by iterative mapping and assembly of short reads to eliminate gaps. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. A vertebrate case study of the quality of assemblies derived from next-generation sequences. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome project standards in a new era of sequencing. It is a key publication for understanding how extensive alternative splicing is in human tissues, for understanding how powerful RNA-seq data are as a tool for discovering new transcripts and for quantifying their abundance and differential expression patterns.Ĭhain, P. This paper provides one of the most extensively documented surveys of alternatively spliced transcripts. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-seq. Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).įinishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Finishing a whole-genome shotgun: release 3 of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome sequence. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. For example, if putting together an extensive annotated bibliography for stem cell research, it might be best to divide the sources into categories such as ethical concerns, scholarly analyses, and political ramifications.įor more examples, a quick search at a library or even on the Internet should produce several examples of annotated bibliographies in your area.Adams, M. If you are writing an annotated bibliography with many sources, it may be helpful to divide the sources into categories. Note also that the entries are alphabetized by the first word in the bibliographic entry. The bibliographic information above is proper MLA format (use whatever style is appropriate in your field) and the annotations are in paragraph form. But again, if your assignment is to only use scholarly sources, then you will probably want to avoid magazines and popular web sites. You may want to investigate how scholarly sources are treating this topic differently than more popular sources. Using a variety of sources can help give you a broader picture of what is being said about your topic. "Bush Stands Pat on Stem Cell Policy." CNN. How does it fit into your research? Is this a helpful resource? Too scholarly? Not scholarly enough? Too general/specific? Since "stem cell research" is a very broad topic, has this source helped you to narrow your topic? After summarizing and assessing, you can now reflect on this source. The length of your annotation will depend on the assignment or on the purpose of your annotated bibliography. Does it seem like a reliable and current source? Why? Is the research biased or objective? Are the facts well documented? Who is the author? Is she qualified in this subject? Is this source scholarly, popular, some of both? If one were really writing an annotation for this source, one would offer a brief summary of what this book says about stem cell research.Īfter a brief summary, it would be appropriate to assess this source and offer some criticisms of it. This is the annotation of the above source, which is formatted according to MLA 2016 (8 th ed.) guidelines for the bibliographic information listed above. The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy. Writing Letters of Recommendation for Students.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |